The Gap in Most Gateway 2 Submissions

Written By Lucy Guest

There is a growing number of building safety consultants supporting Gateway 2.

However, many focus on process and compliance management and fewer specialise in accessibility and inclusive design at the level now required.

This creates a gap where:

  • Designs may technically comply, but lack depth in justification

  • Accessibility is treated as a checklist rather than a strategy

  • Opportunities to strengthen submissions are missed

How GRD supports design teams

At GRD:EDI, our focus is on strengthening the design itself, particularly in relation to Part M and inclusive environments.

We work alongside architects and developers to:

  • Undertake detailed design appraisals with a focus on accessibility

  • Identify where Part M compliance is not fully demonstrated

  • Support justification for alternative solutions beyond Approved Document M

  • Align designs with appropriate standards such as BS 8300 and sector-specific guidance

  • Provide clear, structured input that can be carried through into Gateway 2 submissions

While we are not a duty-holder, our role is to provide independent, specialist advice that strengthens the overall submission and reduces risk at the Gateway 2 approval stage.

Supporting complex and high-value schemes

Our team has supported major developments with a combined value exceeding £2.5 billion.

This includes working with design teams on complex projects where accessibility, compliance and commercial delivery must be balanced carefully.

We understand how decisions made at design stage impact programme, cost and approval, and we work with teams to ensure those decisions are robust and defensible.

A more robust approach to Gateway 2

Gateway 2 has shifted expectations.

It is no longer enough to demonstrate that a design broadly complies. It must show clear, reasoned and well-evidenced decision making.

Part M is one of the areas where this is most visible.

Taking a more detailed and structured approach early within the design stage can significantly improve the strength of a submission and assist with reducing the risk of delay.

Planning your next project

If you are working on a scheme where Gateway 2 approval is required, early input on accessibility and compliance can make a measurable difference.

If you would like to discuss how GRD:EDI can support your design team, we would be happy to help.

Further information

For more detail on the Building Safety Act and Gateway 2 requirements, the following resources provide useful guidance:

Lucy Guest
Next

GRD: EDI Appointed as Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Consultant on £1bn Eastgate Quarter Leeds Regeneration